A specific bounded claim survived its named gate and the supporting evidence was preserved.
PUBLIC RECORD · DATED ENTRIES
JCEE PUBLIC REGISTRY
JCEE Labs Public Registry:
results, boundaries, and status
The public registry records what JCEE Labs can responsibly say about selected systems, research programs, and governing standards.
PUBLIC PROJECTION · SANITIZEDMILESTONES + CANDIDATES + OPEN GATES
PUBLIC CLAIM CONTROL
The registry shows status, evidence boundary, and limitation.
Each entry names a recorded milestone, its scope, and its limitations. Newer candidate work is listed separately so a source-control change cannot be mistaken for a released product.
Distribution, MISE, AP Gate, and JEV were reconciled against the portfolio records and preserved evidence on September 29, 2026. Other entries retain their own dated evidence boundaries. For the October infrastructure P0–P3 summary, including the P3 hold, see the technology page. This page is a selected record, not a claim that every program was freshly reviewed today.
STATUS LANGUAGETHE LABEL DOES NOT OVERRIDE THE BOUNDARY
How to read this record.
Results exist, but reproduction, transfer, adversarial review, or external verification remains incomplete.
A stable public specification or contract exists; implementation and transfer claims remain separately bounded.
A governance rule adopted by JCEE Labs. It is not an empirical result.
SELECTED PUBLIC RECORDSSELECTED ENTRIES REVIEWED · SEPTEMBER 29, 2026
Current public entries.
Platforms
01
ORDER-INTEGRITY DEVELOPMENTREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 29, 2026
JCEE Distribution P0.1
PRIVATE SOURCE MERGED · REAL WORKFLOW NOT RUNThe initial industry workflow compares purchase orders with sales orders and records missing, mismatched, duplicate, or matching records.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- The preserved September 14 dry run matched 20/20 expected synthetic classifications: 13 PASS, one missing order, five field mismatches, and one duplicate, with zero external effects. The private source merge is verified; the retained pre-merge CI record passed on Python 3.10 and 3.12.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- This review did not rerun the dry run or establish a post-merge CI result. No customer data, email, or live ERP connection; no customer ROI or real-world accuracy claim. Approval for a real shadow evaluation remains outstanding.
- NEXT GATE
- Obtain a defined company/IT approval before calibration and a limited read-only shadow evaluation.
Execution
01
PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT CANDIDATESEPTEMBER 10, 2026
JCEE VOW 1.1.1.dev3
INTERNAL USABILITY ACCEPTED · RELEASE ON HOLDThe exact reviewed candidate and phased CI controls were admitted to private source control. VOW 1.1 remains the frozen runtime milestone.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- The exact dev3 source was admitted privately. The September 10 reviewed founder-usability return records one synthetic dry run, zero recorded effects, and retrieval of the same full receipt without rerunning the quest. The founder accepted the bounded internal experience.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- Usability acceptance does not establish installed-wheel full-suite parity or production readiness. Release, deployment, and active-root promotion remain on hold. The separate integration-correctness candidate remains NOT_RUN.
- NEXT GATE
- Complete the separately scoped integration-correctness gate; preserve frozen results and version any repair.
02
PAYMENT EXECUTION ASSURANCE DEVELOPMENTREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 29, 2026
AP Gate
BOUNDED COMPARISON RETAINED · SUCCESSOR NOT RUNContract, execution/recovery, and independent-verifier reference code are present. The verifier derives bounded conclusions from declared evidence.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- The practical comparison completed 78 local executions across 26 synthetic worlds and three lanes, with zero scored safety violations. Conventional governed repair fulfilled 9/9 eligible effects, the ELP verifier integration 8/9, and block-only 5/9.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- No incremental ELP value was shown in this slice. One acknowledgement remained unresolved per lane. A successor equal-information comparison is design-only and has not been run. Native target integration and production payment control remain unqualified.
- NEXT GATE
- Resolve the separately governed execution bindings before implementing or running the successor comparison; retain the conventional governed-repair reference.
03
EXECUTION RUNTIMEAUGUST 12, 2026
JCEE VOW 1.1
VERIFIED MILESTONE · ACTIVE HARDENINGA pinned JCEE VOW release and preserved verification record for evidence-first execution, interruption, recovery, and bounded verdicts.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- A defined release exists and its covered behavior completed the named internal release gate.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- Not independent certification, universal safety, default legal compliance, or production readiness in every environment.
04
INTEGRATION CANDIDATEREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 14, 2026
VOW I1 Integration Correctness
SEALED CANDIDATE · NOT RUNThe separately scoped integration-correctness evaluation for VOW.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- A sealed 32-test candidate is recorded. Its presence is preparation, not a completed execution result.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- No integration-correctness pass or release promotion follows from the candidate.
05
DEVELOPER WORKFLOW DESIGNREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 14, 2026
VOW Developer Experience Bridge
D0 DESIGN PREREGISTERED · NOT IMPLEMENTEDA planned bridge between developer workflows and reviewable execution evidence.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- A private design and acceptance package exists.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- No implementation or runtime test. The public editor naming/release remains held behind the separate integration gate.
06
EDGE-LANGUAGE RESEARCH PROTOTYPEREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 14, 2026
AEEL-0009
PROTOTYPE ARCHIVE RECOVEREDA separate language and execution-tooling research asset for edge workflows.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- The archive contains connected language, model, telemetry, and attestation tooling.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- Research fixtures do not establish hardware enforcement, real key custody, or deployment integration. AEEL is a separate asset from VOW.
Assurance
01
PORTABLE EVIDENCE CONTRACTREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 14, 2026
JEC 1.0 / 1.0.1 successor
DEFINED CONTRACT · APPROVED SUCCESSORA runtime-neutral evidence contract for carrying typed records, scope, lineage, commitments, and declared uncertainty.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- The current register carries forward JEC 1.0.1 packaging R1 with corrected 8/8 validation and the approved variant A. Packaging validation does not prove the truth of a record.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- A well-formed or signed record does not by itself prove that its source was competent, complete, current, or truthful.
02
CLAIM-SCOPED VERIFICATIONREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 14, 2026
JCEE Assurance
FROZEN VERIFICATION AND LEDGER MILESTONESResearch into independently deriving bounded execution conclusions from named evidence, authority, scope, and verification rules.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- JA-P0.3 and JA-P0.4 have separate preserved verification and cross-host ledger receipts. Their specific versions and limits are listed below; they are not one blanket system certification.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- Not a universal exactly-once guarantee, generalized Byzantine-resilience claim, or third-party certification.
03
INDEPENDENT EVIDENCE JUDGMENTREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 14, 2026
IEJ
LOCAL HARNESS REPRODUCED · MODEL TEST NOT RUNA separate judgment lane for testing whether a reviewer can rederive a terminal result without trusting the original narrator.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- Frozen deterministic stages remain preserved. The P0.4 local harness reproduced 5/5; the provider/model experiment remains unexecuted. A harness result is not a model result.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- The current record does not establish general-purpose judgment correctness or replace qualified external review.
04
INSPECTION AND REPLAYREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 14, 2026
Evidence Engine
EXPERIMENTAL · BOUNDED SHADOW SLICEThe presentation and inspection layer for claim-to-effect records, verification output, and replayable evidence.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- The preserved synthetic refund pilot reports 11/11 cases and 14 tests. Evidence admission, snapshot verification, and operator display are connected in bounded local scope.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- Presentation does not strengthen the underlying evidence, establish external truth, or substitute for an independent verifier.
05
FROZEN VERIFIERREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 14, 2026
JA-P0.3 Independent Verification Kernel
BOUNDED REPRODUCTION COMPLETEA verifier that derives claim-scoped conclusions from declared evidence.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- The locked reproduction recorded 30/30 compatibility checks, 14/14 native checks, and 500/500 mutations for two active profiles.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- Three QCS-dependent profiles remain blocked by the absent exact accepted specification digest. No universal authority-truth claim.
06
FROZEN LEDGER AND SNAPSHOTSREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 14, 2026
JA-P0.4 Immutable Evidence Ledger
CROSS-HOST REPRODUCTION COMPLETEPreserves admitted evidence and verifiable snapshots for downstream inspection.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- The final receipt records 27 native checks, 100 determinism checks, and 1,000 mutations on two hosts. The component is used in the bounded Evidence Engine slice.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- Ledger integrity does not prove external truth or activate blocked verifier profiles.
07
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE ANCHORINGREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 14, 2026
JEC-EA P0.2A
BOUNDED HOST-B QUALIFICATIONResearch into anchoring portable evidence to external timestamp and transparency records.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- The Host-B RUN2 receipt reports a bounded timestamp/transparency qualification using the pinned contract variant and a synthetic transparency anchor.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- External key custody, immutable storage, formal P0.2 authority, and Host-A consumption remain unqualified.
08
CROSS-SYSTEM EVIDENCEREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 14, 2026
JCEE Compounding System P0.5
FROZEN BOUNDED CANDIDATETests whether evidence can retain attributable provenance as it moves between systems.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- The preserved P0.5 gate passed 33/33 invariants on Python 3.10 and 3.12.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- Attributable provenance is not world truth, competent authority, or permission to execute. No automatic P0.6.
Research
01
SEMANTIC-KERNEL RESEARCHSEPTEMBER 14, 2026
CRUCIBLE P0.2
BOUNDED PASS · CONVENTIONAL PARITYThe terminal R52 review records a frozen synthetic benchmark and held-out transfer evaluation, including a conventional comparator.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- 96/96 payment and 64/64 held-out verdicts matched. Go reproduced 160/160 verdicts. The conventional composite also matched all 160.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- Synthetic semantic evidence, not exclusive JCEE mechanisms, novelty, independent-team verification, or production safety. P0.2 GitHub CI remains NOT_RUN.
- NEXT GATE
- Evaluate operational integration burden or independent-team real-system reproduction under a separate gate.
02
TRANSITION CALCULUS RESEARCHAUGUST 13, 2026
QCS-2.0
VERIFIED MILESTONE · CORE FROZENA workflow-free transition-legality calculus for deciding whether current authoritative evidence justifies a proposed transition.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- The frozen normative core passed its planned reproduction gate across the two tested authority classes.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- Not universal correctness, production readiness, or guaranteed transfer to every future substrate.
03
COMPOSITION AND FAILURE OPERATIONSREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 14, 2026
CRUCIBLE P0.3
BROAD CLAIM RETIRED · NARROW RESIDUALThe completed successor tests operational burden against a strong conventional composition. P0.2 remains preserved.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- Both lanes met the tested safety criteria. Four burden axes tied; integration touchpoints were 3 versus 5. The terminal result retired the broad composition-compression claim. The recorded Python 3.10/3.12 CI reproduction passed.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- Synthetic, same-author research. No general advantage, independent-team verification, customer economics, or production-safety result.
04
SOFTWARE TOPOLOGY RESEARCHREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 14, 2026
AUTOGRAPHY P0.7
BOUNDED RESULT PRESERVED · CI BLOCKEDCross-domain software topology discovery research.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- The frozen result is KNOWN / PASS_BOUNDED with zero novel primitives. The preserved source archive is authoritative for that result.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- The historical repository archive is malformed; no green P0.7 CI or P0.8 result is claimed.
05
LOCAL AUTHORITY-BOUNDARY STUDYREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 29, 2026
JEV P0.1
SYNTHETIC REPLAY RECOVERED · LIVE INTEGRATION NOT RUNA frozen local evaluator studies the separation between model confidence and permission using supplied synthetic state.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- The September 24 recovered replay reproduced the preserved local result, including the confidence-sweep and provider-swap checks. It supports the specified local boundary only.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- No live JEV deployment, native JCEE component integration, independent verifier, or independent-team reproduction. An otherwise authorized wrong answer can be allowed: permission does not prove semantic correctness. The successor design remains NOT_RUN.
- NEXT GATE
- Keep successor implementation and execution on hold until its required bindings and verification boundary are established.
06
LEARNING AND TEACHING ORCHESTRATIONREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 14, 2026
LEM / ESL
SYNTHETIC INTEGRATION MILESTONEResearch into evidence-informed learning and teaching workflows.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- The preserved synthetic week reports 13/13 checks across connected learning components.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- No educational-efficacy, learner-proficiency, or production-launch result.
07
MISUSE-TRACE BENCHMARKREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 14, 2026
LAM P0.1
HARNESS CONFORMANCE · MODEL RESULT PENDINGA local benchmark for preserving and scoring misuse-related traces.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- Three reference cases cover normal operation, read failure, and prompt-injection containment.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- A functioning harness does not establish live model behavior.
08
SEMANTIC RETRIEVAL RESEARCHREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 14, 2026
VELA
R4 OVERALL FAIL · R6 CHECKPOINTA synthetic retrieval and evaluation research pipeline.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- R4 was a valid study with a narrow supported effect, but missed all three absolute capability thresholds.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- No production retrieval capability. The R6 primary execution remains locked pending its named prerequisites.
09
MATHEMATICAL COREREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 14, 2026
TOT 0.3R1
FROZEN MATHEMATICAL MILESTONEA finite relational mathematical research core, separate from implementation experiments.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- The frozen T1–T13 core has been recovered.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- Later 0.4 acceptance still requires exact evidence backfill. No physical correspondence or automatic runtime capability.
10
CONTINUUM AND LOCALITY RESEARCHREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 14, 2026
RTL-SR P0.8
CONDITIONAL PASS · PHYSICAL BRIDGE NO-GOResearch into the mathematical assumptions needed for continuum and locality claims.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- A conditional result holds in the declared continuum class.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- Abstract-graph locality and the physical bridge remain NO_GO. No independently derived physical geometry or empirical clock law.
11
PHYSICAL-EXPERIMENT FEASIBILITYREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 14, 2026
GMDA P0.3–P0.5
FEASIBILITY STUDIED · FULL STACK NOT READYFeasibility research for a proposed physical measurement program.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- P0.3 identified a source-modulation path; P0.4 identified an institutional path while recording incomplete sensor-stack maturity.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- P0.5 qualification is preregistered, not run. No partner access, outreach result, physical campaign, or new-physics result.
Personal apps
01
PERSONAL APPLICATION SUITEREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 14, 2026
Howm.io Platform R3
IMPLEMENTED CANDIDATE · NOT LAUNCHEDThe separate JCEE personal-app platform and catalog.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- Eight routes built; 11/11 DOM interaction checks and 20/20 source-file readbacks matched.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- Rendered browser/device acceptance, service integration, merge, deployment, and public launch remain open.
02
PERSONAL CULINARY APPLICATIONREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 29, 2026
MISE / SOUS
WEB MVP EVIDENCE RECOVERED · REPEATED USE NOT VALIDATEDThe personal culinary application in the Howm suite. The preserved source and earlier receipts use the SOUS name.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- The canonical source contains the September 12 build and test report and a preserved passing end-to-end receipt covering AI meal options, recipe steps, cooking recovery, a profile signal, and a saved recipe. The report records 24 passing tests plus type and build checks. These are historical receipts, not new runs.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- A working test flow does not establish repeated cooking, retention, willingness to pay, or an advantage from personalization. The current hosted pilot and native iOS/TestFlight readiness remain unresolved; no production-readiness claim is made.
- NEXT GATE
- Evaluate second and third cooking sessions, including a defined generic-versus-personalized comparison, before making user-value claims.
03
PERSONAL REFLECTION APPLICATIONREVIEWED SEPTEMBER 14, 2026
Mirrored / Higher Self
BACKEND AND IOS DEVELOPMENTA personal application centered on reflection and the higher-self experience.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- Backend and iOS repositories and application routes exist. The current review records prepared chat/check-in error-handling fixes.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- Full builds, device acceptance, and current production validation remain to be established. This work is separate from VOW.
Standards
01
RESEARCH GOVERNANCEAUGUST 13, 2026
JRP-000 · The Evidence Boundary
ADOPTED STANDARDThe public standard governing claim cards, evidence packages, admission gates, verdict language, limitations, and corrections.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- A governing JCEE Labs research standard.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- An institutional standard, not an empirical result, external consensus standard, or independent certification.
02
INSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCEAUGUST 31, 2026
JCEE First Principle
ADOPTED STANDARDHypotheses may begin with experience, intuition, coherence, imagination, serendipity, faith, love, or felt meaning. Consequential authority still must be earned.
- WHAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS
- A governing separation between hypothesis generation, empirical claim, system state, and consequential authority.
- KNOWN BOUNDARY
- The principle does not settle metaphysical questions; it constrains what JCEE may claim or authorize from available evidence.
RESPONSIBLE DISCLOSURE
Evidence-first does not mean publishing every artifact.
JCEE may withhold source code, private evidence packages, attack corpora, security-sensitive details, patent material, customer information, and counsel work product while still keeping each public claim inside a clear evidence boundary.
A withheld artifact cannot be used to make an unlimited public claim. Where independent review is required, it must occur through an appropriate confidential process.
PUBLIC RESEARCH FIELD / IRRATIONAL ORDERONE RULE · CONTINUOUS UNFOLDING
PUBLIC MATHEMATICAL VISUALIZATION
Perfect rule.
No true repeat.
This live client-side field demonstrates how a small public rule can generate intricate non-periodic geometry. It is presented as a mathematical visualization, not as QCS execution, proof of a physical claim, or evidence for a proprietary JCEE mechanism.
PUBLIC GENERATIVE RULE
θₙ = 2π α n² · pₙ₊₁ = pₙ + (cos θₙ, sin θₙ)